O•P•I•N•I•O•N
Go Postal First
GCould President Obama use his significant political
skills, charm and leadership to do the impossible? Could
he actually decrease the cost of a service that has been increasing in cost for the last 50 years?
Could the president decrease the cost of a first class
stamp by 10 cents? Could he do it in a way that was actually driven by cost decreases, while protecting quality and
services? Could he do it by actually decreasing the costs
of the United States Postal Service?
If you believe that the answer to this question is no,
then why would we ever allow the president to reform
health care, based upon his promises to decrease costs
and expand access?
President Obama is bound and determined to propose and pass his health care reform ideas THIS YEAR,
stating in his March 24 press conference regarding the
economic crisis, “We will invest in reform that will bring
down the cost of health care for families, businesses and
our government...”
The president speaks with great eloquence and conviction that his administration and the federal government
can actually reduce the $2.2 trillion that our country consumes in health care expenditures.
Not so fast. Should we believe that the federal government can really reduce of the cost of anything, let alone
something as complex as health care? Should we really
believe that the same federal government that gave us
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the $630 million Capitol
Visitor’s Center and the $640 toilet seat can actually reduce the cost of one-sixth of the American economy?
Answering yes to this is akin to Charlie Brown trusting that Lucy is finally going to hold the football for
him to kick.
Here’s an idea: Before we give our new president carte
blanche authority to reinvent our world-renown health
care system, let’s act with due diligence, requiring the
successful completion of a pilot study first. I propose
that we require the Obama administration to demonstrate its competence cutting other costs prior to enacting health care reform.
The pilot program goal would be to reduce the cost of
a U.S. first class stamp by 10 cents.
Plain and simple, Mr. Obama, we ask you to reduce
the price of a stamp by a dime by reducing the costs of
the USPS while maintaining the same quality of service.
by Dave Petno
Accelerated Benefits
Hudson, OH
dpetno@accben.com
Before you get started on your task, let’s list five key,
non-negotiable items that will ensure that you are, in
fact, cutting costs and not decreasing quality, services or
playing a shell game with your revenue sources.
Non-Negotiable Items for the Pilot Program:
1. The program cannot decrease the cost of a stamp by
increasing taxes, fees, surcharges or any other user
fees that are ultimately paid by the citizens of our
country.
2. The program cannot decrease the cost of a stamp by
increasing the cost of other postage charged for
other things at the U.S. Postal Service. This is called
“cost shifting” rather than cost reduction.
3. The program cannot decrease the cost of a stamp by
drawing revenue from other government agencies via
transfer payments or stimulus dollars. You are not
permitted to rob Peter to pay Paul.
4. The program cannot decrease the cost of a stamp by
deteriorating the quality of the service or decreasing
the number of services that are available. (For example, you can’t increase delivery times. Your mail delivery accuracy must remain just as high as before.)
5. The program cannot decrease the cost of a stamp by
making people wait longer to purchase or receive
services. Lines at the post office cannot get longer,
and waiting time to receive mail cannot increase.
This will be a huge challenge for the USPS. But I
would ask you, if the president cannot reduce the cost of
a stamp by 10 cents without violating the non-negotiable
items, why would we ever allow him to tinker with one of
the most crucial sectors of our economy?
Compared to health care, reforming the USPS should
be a piece of cake.
In many ways, the USPS is very similar to the reach and
geographic scope of the American health care system. On
the other hand, no one would argue that the post office is
anywhere near as complex an organization as a hospital.
The USPS is 100% government-owned and its footprint covers 100% of the country, as well as all U.S. territories. And, since the USPS is 100% owned and controlled
by the federal government, President Obama could restructure the entire agency with one executive order.
According to Postal Facts 20091, the USPS boasts:
•
32,741 post offices nationwide